Log in

[sticky post] FRiENDS OnLy

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Since March 2005
Origional artwork by Deacon Black
This journal is now friends only.

If you would like to be added, please add me, and then comment on this post only with:

01:x: your name
02:x: how you found my journal
03:x: what your favorite colour is
04:x: your birthday
05:x: any other random thing about yourself or some unrelated field (optional)
06:x: reccommend a movie or book or a song or something (optional)

Then, I'll decide if I'm going to add you. I'm pretty lenient in my adding practices, but if all you post is surveys, or you grate on my nerves, I wont hesitate to remove you. Don't worry about sounding weird either, all comments are screened.



The Reappropriation of Words & Symbols

(Written while waiting for 2+ hours at the DMV yesterday, side note: the dictionary did not recognize the word reappropriate. conspiracy?)

I'm having a hard time finding the line. As a Jewish woman I feel it appropriate to reappropriate (ha) the word CUNT to it's original meaning and reappropriating the concept of tattoos from what they meant in the concentration camps. I, however, do not feel comfortable with reappropriating the swastika back to it's original ancient roots. As a symbol it was originally a representation of peace and "doing good". I think it's important for people to know where that symbol came from but I'm not ready for the initial reaction of it to to the masses to completely change. I have read and can logically understand the movement's stance on wanting to reappropriate the swastika and maybe one day I'll agree with them but for now it just feels...icky (how ♀non-logical♀ of me).

No matter, censorship is never the answer. Every word/symbol/etc no matter how powerful and/or hateful deserves a place somewhere within modern dialog, even if just to serve the purpose of giving historical context as to how the word was used to oppress people or commit genocides unfairly (is there a fair way to do those 2 things?)

This reappropriation extends to ASL. Since the forehead designates ♂male♂ and the anitomically inferior mouth denotes ♀female♀ (Jailbreak the ASL patriarchy!), the sign for God starts above the forehead (one hand "B" position, medially facing palm), the best we have for sign for Goddess (since you can't find it in any of the translating dictionaries, which is a problem in and of it's self) is the same hand position and movement but starts at the chin. While it's true that the sign for bastard is the same "B" shape, it is usually tapped twice on the forehead and since the God sign starts above, it is hard to confuse the two. However, the sign for BITCH is used far more often in the lexicon (surprise) and, while the original sign is the same "B" handshape tapped twice, it often is taped only once for emphasis, leaving it to look remarkably similar to the above described Goddess sign, especially when seen sandwiched between other signs.

Without diverging into the debated racism that is/has been until very recently in the language (due to it being a visual language, thus describing groups of people based on visual similarities), this throws the discussion into similar female-centric words that have been dubbed insults: SISSY, BITCH, CUNT, PUSSY, WUS, (etc). The obvious word missing that I really shouldn't have any say in (unless possibly one day I am the mother to a child of a chid that may identify with the community this directly affects with an understanding that my say has an expiration date, this of course debatable because a whole nother discussion revolves around who gets to decide what words/symbols should be reappropriated and why) is NIGGER. There will probably never be a consensus on whether this word should be reappropriated or not. A significant difference is that the origins of that word have never meant anything positive, it has ALWAYS been used to marginalize people. Above stated words/symbols, which I think I have more of a say in, come from very powerful and positive origins. In the case of tattoos, they never had a significance in Jewish culture before the Holocaust because Jews had no reason to be tattooed (besides it being a mutilation of your body which was insulting to God because ⚧ made you perfect in ⚧ eyes purposefully DON'T MESS WITH GOD!) but the origins were very positive/significant in other cultures. Does this mean my reappropriation is also an appropriation of other indigenous cultures? Damn, how meta can this monologue get?

I've really enjoyed processing these thoughts over the last few days when they've been almost an obsession of mine. What do you ⚧ think?


it's human season

name change...and now you know.

I. My name is Jordan.
and you should hence forth refer to me as such (or whatever variations you see fit).
I haven't worked out my full name yet, but, I'm working on it.

It is way too early in the morning to be awake, but I am not particularly tired.

2)happy birthday to everett :) [how's that for roundabout livejournalness, because I havne't said it enough in person, really, I havne't]

C) kathleen's rant on why everyone should like the beatles makes me happy. (I guess you can't read it unless you're on her friends list, sucks for you)

As you were.


Latest Month

July 2012


RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Witold Riedel